Positive non-interventionism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Part of the series on Chicago school of economics

Movements Libertarianism Neoliberalism Neoconservatism Positive non-interventionism Organizations Cato Institute Reason Foundation George Mason University Library of Economics and Liberty Beliefs Monetarism Neoclassical economics Consequentialist libertarianism People David Friedman Milton Friedman Rose Friedman Frank Knight Ronald Coase Robert Fogel Gary Becker Robert E. Lucas George Stigler Friedrich von Hayek (assossiated) Theories Comparative advantage Consumer price index Economic growth Economic rationalism Efficient-market hypothesis Friedman rule Friedman's k-percent rule Game theory Gross domestic product Homo economicus International economics International finance International trade Laffer curve Monetary theory Public choice theory Quantity theory of money Rational agent Rational choice theory Rational expectations theory Symmetrical inflation target Ideas Central banks Denationalization Deregulation Economic freedom Economic integration Economic interdependence Economic liberalization Exchange rate Fair trade Fiat currency Free markets Free trade Foreign exchange reserves Globalization Inflation adjustment Inflation targeting Intellectual property Marketization Laissez-faire Minarchism Negative income tax Open market operations Private property Privatization School vouchers Single market Public highway Tax cuts Tax reform Topics Anti-capitalism Alter-globalization Anti-globalization Capitalism Portal Economics Portal Politics Portal  v • d • e

Positive non-interventionism was the economic policy of Hong Kong during British rule. It was first officially implemented in 1971 by John James Cowperthwaite, who observed that the economy was doing well in the absence of government intervention. The policy was continued by subsequent Financial Secretaries, including Sir Philip Haddon-Cave. Milton Friedman has cited it as a fairly comprehensive implementation of laissez-faire policy, although Haddon-Cave has stated that the description of Hong Kong as a laissez-faire society was "frequent but inadequate"^[1]

Contents 1 First-hand explanation 2 See also 3 References 4 External links

[edit] First-hand explanation

According to Cowperthwaite:

"In the long run, the aggregate of decisions of individual businessmen, exercising individual judgment in a free economy, even if often mistaken, is less likely to do harm than the centralised decisions of a government, and certainly the harm is likely to be counteracted faster."

According to Haddon-Cave:

"positive non-interventionism involves taking the view that it is normally futile and damaging to the growth rate of an economy, particularly an open economy, for the Government to attempt to plan the allocation of resources available to the private sector and to frustrate the operation of market forces"

Haddon-Cave goes on to say that the "positive" part means the government carefully considers each possible intervention to determine "where the advantage" lies, and although usually it will come to the conclusion that the intervention is harmful, sometimes it will decide to intervene.

This policy means that the government had to respond when industries with social obligations ran into trouble and when an institution needed regulation to prevent inequitable practices.

[edit] See also

• Laissez-faire

[edit] References

[edit] External links

• Big Market, Small Government - by Donald Tsang, Chief Executive of Hong Kong