Welcome to dextri.com on July 5 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Projective representation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

In the mathematical field of representation theory, a projective representation of a group G on a vector space V over a field F is a group homomorphism from G to

PGL(V,F) = GL(V,F)/F

where GL(V,F) is the automorphism group of invertible linear transformations of V over F and F* here is the normal subgroup consisting of multiplications of vectors in V by nonzero elements of F (that is, scalar multiples of the identity).[1]

Contents

[edit] Linear representations and projective representations

One way in which a projective representation can arise is by taking a linear group representation of G on V and applying the homomorphism

GL(V, F) → PGL(V, F),

which is the quotient by the subgroup F. The interest for algebra is in the process in the other direction: given a projective representation, try to 'lift' it to a conventional linear representation.

The analysis of this question involves group cohomology. Indeed, if one introduces for g in G a lifted element L(g) in lifting from PGL(V) back to GL(V), the lifts must satisfy

L(gh) = c(g,h)L(g)L(h)

for some constant c(g,h) in F. The 2-cocycle or Schur multiplier c must satisfy the cocycle equation

c(h,k)c(g,hk) = c(g,h)c(gh,k)

for all g, h, k in G, A different choice of lift L' (g)= f(g) L(g) will result in a new cocycle

c^\prime(g,h) = f(gh)f(g)^{-1} f(h)^{-1} c(g,h)

cohomologous to c. Thus L defines a unique class in H2(G, F), which need not be trivial. For example, in the case of the symmetric group and alternating group, Schur proved that there is exactly one non-trivial class of Schur multiplier and completely determined all the corresponding irreducible representations.[2]

It is shown, however, that this leads to an extension problem for G. If G is correctly extended we can speak of a linear representation of the extended group, which gives back the initial projective representation on factoring by F and the extending subgroup. The solution is always a central extension. From Schur's lemma, it follows that the irreducible representations of central extensions of G, and the projective representations of G, describe essentially the same questions of representation theory.

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Gannon 2006, pp. 176–179.
  2. ^ Schur 1911

[edit] References

[edit] See also

Personal tools
Languages

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs