Changes related to "Wikipedia:Contact us/Links"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of changes made recently to pages linked from a specified page (or to members of a specified category). Changes to pages on your watchlist are shown in bold.
5 July 2009
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:External links; 20:57 . . (+148) . . WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) (Rv: this text is here because nobody reads the rest of the page)
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:External links; 17:26 . . (-70) . . DreamGuy (talk | contribs) (→Links normally to be avoided: in fact, we already say official website elsewhere is a yes, so no need to even list this, just confuses people)
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:External links; 17:25 . . (-78) . . DreamGuy (talk | contribs) (→Links normally to be avoided: the except line makes no sense in this context, this is the NO section, the except negates the no, and two NOs do not mean YES, they mean WAY NO)
3 July 2009
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Dispute resolution; 20:43 . . (-1) . . Dank (talk | contribs) (→Resolving disputes: Wikipedia:Requesting dispute resolution is not an article)
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Dispute resolution; 20:42 . . (-4) . . Dank (talk | contribs) (→Focus on content: Wikipedia:Editing policy is not an article)
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Dispute resolution; 01:35 . . (-561) . . JoaquimMetalhead (talk | contribs) (sorry : ))
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Dispute resolution; 01:23 . . (+561) . . JoaquimMetalhead (talk | contribs)
30 June 2009
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:Dispute resolution; 23:33 . . (+143) . . Cenarium (talk | contribs) (→Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard: add WP:CNB)
29 June 2009
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:External links; 23:12 . . (-25) . . Themfromspace (talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 edit by Pmanderson; Rvt. this is a big difference, bring it to the talk page first. long lists of links in themselves are indeed best avoided. (TW))
- (diff) (hist) . . Wikipedia:External links; 20:57 . . (+25) . . Pmanderson (talk | contribs) (→Links to be considered: what NOTLINK says.)

