User talk:Nergaal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
| Hey Nergaal. Just thought you should get some recognition for getting Planet up to FA level. :-) It was a bit of a slog, but you stuck with it. Congratulations!Serendipodous 09:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC) |
|
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
| For getting Dwarf Planet to FA, and expanding the brag sheet of the now defunct ACID. Zginder (talk) (Contrib) 16:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC) |
 |
Nergaal has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox. |
 Archives |
|---|
[edit] AfD nomination of Agriculture in Romania
An article that you have been involved in editing, Agriculture in Romania, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agriculture in Romania. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
[edit] Peak uranium
Done
[edit] Maps
Thanks for promoting my maps the last weeks. Sorry I can't respond to your messages most of the time. I'm quite a busy person this period. I only found some time this week-end to see what was going on in Wikipedia.
I really need to improve some of my maps in order to have a chance to become featured images. I plan to update my Roman Empire map (the one with the legionary bases) in the near future. Now I only have a single very good map, this one:
.
I don't know if it's good enough to be a feature image. What do you think?
About the map with the Hungarians in Transylvania, the brown colour means that there's a very limited Hungarian presence (below 1%). I'll add that to the legend.
[edit] Moons of Uranus
I nominated this list to WP:FLC. Ruslik (talk) 18:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Metallica
I made some upgrades to List of Metallica concert tours (considering the FTC "gap"), are you interested in turning it into an FL? igordebraga ≠ 03:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Only that the intro needs to be expanded, and you could research a bit more on supporting acts and such (and add more refs). Maybe the release sections isn't needed, the band doesn't have much live material. I hid the "Notes" (to self) you left there. And just a sidenote in case "reliability of references" is brought up in PR and FLC (though one of those is even in the main Metallica article, so maybe they can pass), the official website has date and place of every concert they made. igordebraga ≠ 18:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Since I did some cleanup in the refs, just the intro, expand it and put a nice picture and we might have a FL. igordebraga ≠ 21:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] HD 40307 for Good Topic
Well, it's finally here. Would you like to take a look at it? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Tropical cyclone scales
Since no one else wanted to officially review it (apparently,) I have. You've seen these comments before as they lie on the talk page. The line you added into the lead concerning the alternative scales needs clarification within the article below, Beaufort scale use above force 12 needs to be addressed before passage, and reference years should be included in all the refs (since they were included in some of the refs.) Thegreatdr (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular
I've added the production information available on the DVD to the article. —TheLeftorium 20:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the barnstar
though the list isn't featured quite yet! :-) Serendipodous 14:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Request
It doesn't appear that the articles were referenced at all, which contributed to the problem. Ergo, as long as they are a nice improvement over what they were, they could be recreated. As for the AfD itself, if you want them restored as they were, you'd go to WP:DRV, since I still see a fairly clear consensus to delete after re-reading it. Wizardman 14:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] ES4 Topic
Shouldn't I be the one to nominate it, then? What would be in it? Just the main article, the Dev. article and the Re-rating article? Geuiwogbil (Talk) 16:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, that's why I stopped working on it. I was pretty discouraged after Knights of the Nine failed FAC (for no good reason, IMHO), so I stopped working on the series. That, and the vitriol spilled after the ESRB re-rating article hit the main page. And the bad blood on Oblivion's talk page. So, then, have you been working on, uh, whatsit, the other one, then? Shivering Isles? It still has no reception, no gameplay, and a messy plot section. If you can get it up to GA, then sure, you can co-nom the set with me. Geuiwogbil (Talk) 17:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Buddhist crisis
You should probably try to get Buddhist crisis a featured topic. Nergaal (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Gee that might take a while. If so, I'm not going to edit those articles on the US officials as they were secondary players, mostly. YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 23:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Leopard GA
Why do you nominate an article for GA when you don't want to improve the points brought up in the review? --Novil Ariandis (talk) 17:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] could you do me a favour, please?
I've tried to master Wiki math markup and failed. I was wondering if you could transcribe the equation at Bruton's page so I could include it in the equilibrium objects list. Thanks for your time. Serendipodous 17:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Nerg, I don't really know what to do about the new note system. I think it's going to be targeted by reviewers because the letters are out of order. But to reorder them would require manually replacing every note in the list, which would be an almost impossible task. Serendipodous 19:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Preview and edit comments
Nice edits to zinc but it would be much easier to track what you are doing if you used preview more often vs saving so much and put a brief explanation in the subject line saying what you did. Thanks again for the great edits - I just wish they could be parsed more easily. :) --mav (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] {{elementbox}} revert
Hi,
What was the rationale for this revert (and this one)? You haven't provided any useful edit summary (which is usually reserved for edits considered to be vandalism, which this certainly wasn't). Please consider using edit summaries when reverting edits made in good faith in future. Thanks. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Oh well
As you probably know, I am not overly fond of having articles on the main page, but I can deal. :-) BTW, thanks for your help with "...hydrostatic equilibrium". That was a stressful assignment, I don't mind saying. Serendipodous 19:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- User:rst20xx wants to create a Solar System lists subtopic, with List of Solar System objects as its main aritlce. I've been consolidating the lists and merging the info where I can but there is a ling way to go before that topic is finished. As regards Jupiter, I've been having evil thoughts that a Jupiter topic cannot be complete without a Magnetosphere of Jupiter article, since Jupiter has the largest magnetosphere in the Solar System :( Serendipodous 12:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- A few ideas. It will take me a while to sketch out; it's a vast subject. Serendipodous 19:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] No content in Category:Template-Class chemistry articles
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Template-Class chemistry articles, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Template-Class chemistry articles has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Template-Class chemistry articles, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for the help with vanadium
I did not want to disturb you or get into an edit conflict so I post it here. In 1805, the French chemist.... And Thanks for your help!! --Stone (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Comment requested ChemicalBondsToCarbon
Please comment on an issue on Template_talk:ChemicalBondsToCarbon concerning a reversal of one of my edits. V8rik (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] NIN FTC
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. Feel free to go ahead with the FTC. In fact, I'd be happy to co-nominate it with you if you want to pursue it. Unfortunately though, I think the last FTC was left somewhat unresolved, and really boiled down to a meta-issue that had to do with the scope of what is considered a "featured topic", or even I "topic", I suppose. I withdrew the nom since it seemed the FTC community was going to hash it out amongst themselves, but it looks like that never happened. So I think that would be the best place to start, since the success of the FTC pretty much hinges on that. Let me know what you plan on doing. I wish I could do more, but I'm just really busy at the moment. I'll do my best to help out if you need it though. Drewcifer (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking point on this. Looks like everything went smoothly! Drewcifer (talk) 21:38, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Haumea controversy
Why did you remove the tags without discussion? They should stay there as long as there is a dispute.--Cerejota (talk) 09:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Iowa class battleship FT nom
I replied to your question, explaining why the article was omitted. TomStar81 (Talk) 19:12, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Moons of Haumea
Hi Nergaal, I am reviewing your article, Moons of Haumea, for GA and have left some comments at Talk:Moons of Haumea/GA1. Basically, as I am familiar with your other articles and know that you write well, I believe you could write this article in a way that is more understandable to the general reader. Please don't hesitate to contact me with questions or comments. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 03:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Yay, we got GA! Nice work :) Iridia (talk) 11:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Controversy over the discovery of Haumea
The article you nominated for GA, Controversy over the discovery of Haumea, quick failed GA because of current edit wars over the POV status of the article. See Talk:Controversy over the discovery of Haumea/GA1. Please renominate it when the disagreement is resolved. Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 03:56, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Zinc
I am up again and I read the page today, although after a quick look it is good and contains some stuff which we should include.--Stone (talk) 20:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Nergaal... I'm a bit concerned about Zinc compounds turning into a fork. I assume that the section in zinc will be turned into a summary, while zinc compounds will contain more detail? Whichever the case, it'll be a bit of work keeping them in sync, whereas a lot of duplication is inevitable? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Outer Solar System featured topic?
I wonder if this would be a good one...would need some work on a few articles, but there's the existing bedrock of KBOs, Scattered disc, Planets beyond Neptune and the rather fantastic quality Oort cloud. Then put in Sedna, Centaurs, unstub Neptune trojan, pull TNOs, Detached object, Hills cloud through GA etc... Think it might be worth it? There's so much good material in there, it would be nice to have it all pulled together in some framework and recognised. Iridia (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Compounds of zinc
I like the newest reorg of the chemistry and compound material at zinc. Spinning off the chemistry detail is also a good idea (of course, we now need to summarize that material at zinc). However, in the future, please make sure to always mention where you copied text from when spinning off a new article. It is customary to do this in the first edit summary. This is necessary per the attribution clause of the GNU FDL and to avoid the appearance of plagiarism. Also, as noted before, edit summaries would make it easier for other editors to know what you are doing. --mav (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Controversial move
Hi. Could you, please, undo your move of Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina. This is a very controversial move, and it should be first discussed in the talk page. This issue was discussed at length there, and the title was judged appropriate. Please. Dc76\talk 05:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's undone for now. Further discussion of the article name can be held on Talk:Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina as part of a requested move. DrKiernan (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Review of snooker article
Nergaal, i have reviewed your article on snooker and have left some comments on the article's review talk page. If you have any questions or comments then please contact me. MarquisCostello (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Symposium: FAC and the sciences
- Your input is requested, either Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates#FAC_symposium or at the subpage where the effort will begin... Thanks! Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 10:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Your DYK nomination for Conpounds of zinc
Please visit Template talk:Did you know#Compounds of zinc and provide your reactions to comments there. Thanks! --Orlady (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Apollo moon landing conspiracy theory article
I'm just wondering, out of curiousity, why you nominated for GA the article (Which needs a ton of work), when you haven't actually edited it yourself? It seems you've also done that for other articles that you haven't contributed to. Noble Story (talk • contributions) 01:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also, let me say bluntly that this article needs a ton of work. So if you're not willing to work on the article, then it should be withdrawn from GAN. Noble Story (talk • contributions) 11:29, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] DYK for Compounds of zinc
 |
On February 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Compounds of zinc, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Dravecky (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Exploration of Jupiter
Have you considered getting it up to FA level? Ruslik and I (well, mainly Ruslik at this point) are in the process of getting Magnetosphere of Jupiter off the ground, and it looks like Jupiter Trojan is an FA lock, so this would be the last piece of the Jupiter FT puzzle. Serendipodous 19:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GA review for Snooker- progress?
Hello Nergaal, you still haven't made the modifications to the snooker article made on the GA review page. When are you intending to do this? Regards, MarquisCostello (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have failed the article due to a lack of progress, but please re-nominate in the future when the article is ready. Regards, MarquisCostello (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Dexter
Hi, I read your post on the dexter episodes talk page. In my opinion, every article to which enough production and reception info can be provided merits it's own article. In fact, we're sort of trying to get a first season Good/Featured topic. A Dexter WikiProject has been proposed, so you can sign if you want. I was planning on creating the project in the next few weeks, with a Featured Topic Drive, similiar to the Simpsons WikiProject.
Hope that answers your question.--Music26/11 20:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again, I noticed your expansion on the dexter episodes article, great job. I wanted to do it for quite some time but never got around to it. Great job, thank you very much.--Music26/11 11:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm planning to take the list to FLC again (you can be listed as a co-nominater if you want to), "Seeing Red" is the only summary that needs expansion. I was about to do so when I noticed your hidden summaries. The first one looks good to me. Is there something about it that your not satisfied with, and are there other things you feel that need to be done before it is nominated again. Thanks.--Music26/11 15:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work on the summary, I assume you're done now. I'll see if I can contact a copy-editor this week so hopefully, the list is good for FLC in the following days.--Music26/11 15:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I contacted User:Baffle gab1978 for a copy-edit, he said he would take a look, but appearently he's quite busy. However, I think the page is good enough; I'll nominate it.--Music26/11 14:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work on the summary, I assume you're done now. I'll see if I can contact a copy-editor this week so hopefully, the list is good for FLC in the following days.--Music26/11 15:27, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm planning to take the list to FLC again (you can be listed as a co-nominater if you want to), "Seeing Red" is the only summary that needs expansion. I was about to do so when I noticed your hidden summaries. The first one looks good to me. Is there something about it that your not satisfied with, and are there other things you feel that need to be done before it is nominated again. Thanks.--Music26/11 15:51, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle/Nominations
Please follow the nomination format at User:Durova/Triple crown winner's circle/Nominations instructions. Cirt (talk) 04:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- If you could do this and reformat your nom appropriately it would really be appreciated. Cirt (talk) 02:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] half life data doesn't match up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Periodic_Table_by_Radioactivity.PNG - that image and the data in the table on this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability#Half-lives_of_large_isotopes disagree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.148.155.36 (talk) 00:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Zinc ready for FAC?
Do you think zinc is ready for FAC? If so, do you want to be a co-nominator? --mav (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Zn-alchemy.jpg
Did you create the below image from scratch? --mav (talk) 03:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] South Park topic drive
Thanks for joining up at the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject South Park/Featured topic Drive/season 1 and working on South Park (season 1) ! Cirt (talk) 08:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Why season 11?
Mainly cause I'm more familiar with Season 11's episodes, having seen most of them at some point. That, and I've already begun most of it :P Cheers. I'mperator 23:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Of course, I might change my mind if you decide to help me with Season 10's ;) Cheers. I'mperator 23:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Semi-protected Romania
Is there any chance that I can perhaps edit the article, and improve it to the best of my ability? Thank you. :) Purpleturple (talk) 09:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Infobox ununoctium
I have fixed this template. Debresser (talk) 08:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Damien (South Park)
Hey Nergaal. Since you're participating in the South Park Drive, I wanted to bring this to your attention. Right now, the FAC for Damien (South Park) seems to be hung up solely on the image rationales for the infobox image and the Omen comparison image. If the Omen picture has to go, I can live with that, but I can't see justifying cutting the infobox image. I'd appreciate it if you could go to the FAC to voice your support if you think the images work, or to provide me with some feedback on how they can be fixed if they aren't. (Of everyone who has criticized so far, nobody has provided any helpful feedback yet). It's over here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Damien (South Park)/archive1. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 21:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Listed buildings in Runcorn
Hi, I noticed you opposed the above GT candidate, however the scope of the topic has now changed from "Listed buildings in Runcorn" to "Grade I listed buildings in Runcorn". Therefore, as there are only two Grade I LBs in Runcorn, the list of articles is no longer incomplete. I thought I'd leave you a note on your talk page in case you didn't see the candidate page. Cheers, Nev1 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Office Season 1 topic
Thanks for bringing the Office Season 1 topic to my attention. That's something I'd like to work on in the near future; especially after the current Office season ends, probably. Right now I'm focused on a few other things but I'd like to work on it later on... — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 01:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Magnetosphere of Jupiter
is getting ready for its peer review. It's still far off from an FAC, so there's still time to get Exploration of Jupiter up to code if you want. Serendipodous 19:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] South Park (season 1)
The "Tom's Rhinoplasty" summary is a bit short compared to the others (and the "Volcano" one is a bit long). Also, the lead needs to be expanded with information from the reception section. Other than that I think it's pretty good. TheLeftorium 19:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] South Park Season One question
Hey Nergaal. I left a question for Leftorium about the South Park (season 1) article, and I wanted to bring it to your attention as well in case you could answer. Also, as I said to Leftorium, thanks for including me as a co-nominator on that! I'm glad some of my text from the episode articles was able to help! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 19:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion of Oxo wall
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oxo wall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- term, fails WP:N
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Guy0307 (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Happy Nergaal's Day!
|
|
Nergaal has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Cheers, If you'd like to show off your awesomeness, you can use this userbox. |
[edit] Template:Chemical Element Isotope
Hi, I was just wondering what you were planning to do with Template:Chemical Element Isotope? Why not just use Template:Chemical Element? Perhaps you want to set up a taskforce in that template? Let me know if I can be of any help. Thanks, — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:56, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Hey
Sorry if I've been a bit grouchy over the last few weeks. I've been under a lot of Wikistress for various reasons, and I just wanted to reassure you that if I snapped at you a few times it wasn't personal. :-) Serendipodous 14:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FOUR
I see from your banner that you do a lot of great editorial content contribution work. Check out WP:FOUR and see if you are eligible for a FOUR award.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] GAR of Exploration of Jupiter
Exploration of Jupiter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.
[edit] May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of celebrities on South Park. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! TJ Spyke 04:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for the Barnstar, Nergaal! Much appreciated! — Hunter Kahn (contribs) 03:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
[edit] Hi Nergaal
I responded to your queries at the FLC page for List of Emperors of the Han Dynasty. Regards.--Pericles of AthensTalk 22:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi again. I found the pronunciation key, Wikipedia:IPA for English, if I were to create a new column(s) for pronunciations. However, wouldn't I need multiple columns, one for posthumous names, one for personal names, and one for era names? That seems like a mountain of work. But more importantly, work that I am kind of unqualified to do.--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Aha! Wiktionary is your friend, my friend. Lol. I can't believe I didn't think of this before. Take for example, Emperor's Gao's character 高 with the flat tone "gāo"; an audio pronunciation is provided at Wiktionary. Should I link each of their characters to Wiktionary?--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm...then again, some entries at Wiktionary, such as 惠 "huì" for Emperor Hui of Han don't have the audio pronunciation available. Perhaps just using Wiktionary would be insufficient. I don't know how many of the Chinese characters will actually have audio files at Wiktionary.--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- What do you think? Should I use Wiktionary regardless?--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. Is there anything else that I can do to change your lean towards support into a full support of the List?--Pericles of AthensTalk 21:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hello?--Pericles of AthensTalk 23:00, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. Is there anything else that I can do to change your lean towards support into a full support of the List?--Pericles of AthensTalk 21:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- What do you think? Should I use Wiktionary regardless?--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm...then again, some entries at Wiktionary, such as 惠 "huì" for Emperor Hui of Han don't have the audio pronunciation available. Perhaps just using Wiktionary would be insufficient. I don't know how many of the Chinese characters will actually have audio files at Wiktionary.--Pericles of AthensTalk 20:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] POTD notification
Hi Nergaal,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:2008 South Ossetia war en.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 7, 2009. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2009-08-07. howcheng {chat} 08:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] End of The Office (US TV series) season 5 puts Seasons of The Office FT under retention
Hi, just to let you know you have 3 months from the end of The Office season 5, or until 14 August, to get the article to FL, or else the topic will be eligible for nomination for removal. Thanks ;) rst20xx (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Polish culture during World War FAR
Hi, in response to your comment over at the article's FAR [1] - in regard to the numerous redlinked names - I got to work and created articles for about 23 of the redlinks. I relied mostly on Polish wiki and online sources. A few of the created articles are not much more than stubs but most are of decent length and I got a DYK for one of them. I plan on continuing to expand them regardless of what happens with the Polish Culture FAR. I would very much appreciate it if you were willing to take another look at the Polish culture during World War II article and see if this is enough to get you to switch from "leaning oppose" to at least "leaning support". I'll also do a few more in the next few days. Thank you! radek (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Haunted angel?
I didn't understand your post on my talk page? — Hunter Kahn (c) 05:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Incidentally, I see above that there's going to be a drive to get The Office (Season 5) to FL by August. I would love to be a part of this, if you and whoever else is involved don't mind? I've been working on getting all the Season 5 episodes to GA status (I've finished the work from Blood Drive on and am working backwards from there) and I've accumulated a lot of material for the Season 5 article as well... — Hunter Kahn (c) 16:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2007 (Canada) (2nd nomination)
You have the right idea, but the wrong process, I think. See my comment at the AfD. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, you should have gone with a merge proposal right from the start if that is what your goal was. While I don't think that merging the lists by year is appropriate, as I said at the AfD if you decide to propose a merge you should come up with a less offensive rationale than "Canada is not a notable enough contry to deserve its "Hot ..." lists for each year." Calling Canada not notable is not a very good way to Win Friends and Influence People. I bring that up because once a merge on a Canadian article is proposed it usually gets posted at the Canadian Wikipedian's Notice Board. CWNB sees a lot of Canadian editors who do not appreciate having Canada called not notable enough. Also you should be prepared to explain why you think Lists of US Hot 100 singles by year meet inclusion criteria for stand alone lists, but Canadian lists do not.--kelapstick (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Whack!
Whack!
For nominating three lists at Articles for deletion when a.) all you wanted was a merge, b.) one of them was a featured list, and c.) your rationale for merge was invalid, as the lists were already long-established as being sufficiently notable. Do you realize how long Canadian Hot 100 would be if those three lists were merged? Didn't you also realize that Canadian Singles Chart and RPM also have chart lists for each year, as do major charts in many, many other countries?! I agree with what Kelapstick said: "If you want to merge the articles, than request a merge, however I suggest coming up with a better argument than Canada's lack of notability." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dabomb87 (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- I apologize about that, I have not been very active lately and have been unable to keep up with the FLC noms.--Truco 503 20:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Han Dynasty topic
List of Emperors of the Han Dynasty is now added to Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Han Dynasty as a featured list. Please, have a look.--Pericles of AthensTalk 23:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of state highways in Marquette County, Michigan/archive1
Please notify relevant WikiProjects and editors using Template:FLRCMessage and list the notifications on the FLRC page, as per the FLRC directions. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] List of Metallica band members
I have nominated List of Metallica band members for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.
[edit] Wikipedia:WikiCup/2010 Signups
A polite reminder to choose a country, city, state or other place to represent. Your last choice was not one of these and has been removed (sorry, we altered the rules since then). Thanks! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 20:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Drama
Wikilinking WP:DRAMA in the course of a perfectly civil reassessment is completely inappropriate and unhelpful. If you believe that there has been drama, then comment on the talk page of the reassessment with specific concerns, rather than adding implicit and unsubstantiated allegations which appear to be aimed at making a point. Geometry guy 20:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Annoying behaviour
Please would you revert your stealing of the page Table of nuclides (sorted by half-life) !
A list of nuclides would be 2 Li, 123 Ti, 45Om, .... and you should know the difference of table and map. I don't know the difference of map and chart!
Moreover I wonder why do you do such an important change without asking on the discussion-page of the article for agreement? Or should I understand your page-moving as vandalism? Regards, Achim1999 (talk) 17:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have left a comment on Achim1999's talk page about this. --kelapstick (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- And initiated a discussion on the article in question's talk page (after reversing the reversal).--kelapstick (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] This Is It (Michael Jackson concerts)
Hi there, I have been the primary editor of this article over the last few months. Due to Jackson's death I have been away from wikipedia, but plan to return on Friday. I was hoping you could remove the GA nomination for the time being? I would like the opportunity to read through it and clean it up a bit more before sending it over. I'm also concerned that the role of AEG Live could spill into something quite serious. Please, if you could withdraw the nomination for the time being, I would appreciate it. Also, If you would like to work with me, to get it featured, I would also really love that :) — Please comment R2 02:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, if you would like to help me get it featured please keep in touch, I can tell your an asset to Wikipedia. — Please comment R2 11:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Exploration of Jupiter
How are you doing locating new sources? I need to know what you've done before I try to do a source cleanup.Serendipodous 08:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Glad I could help, though in truth given the situation I didn't really have much of a choice :-) Serendipodous 17:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] You are an asshole
who has no interest in scholarly honesty. Fuck you. Ricardiana (talk) 22:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
