Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Collaboration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant, or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion regarding the subject, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump proposals page. |
| WP:PW | Talk • PPV expansion • Members • Style guide • Templates • Assessment • Newsletter • Stub articles • Cleanup listing • Article alerts • Broken external links |
|---|
| Collaboration of the Week | |
|---|---|
|
This page is used to choose the professional wrestling collaborations of the week topic will be picked using this page. These are specific professional wrestling-related topics that initially have no article, have only a basic stub-like page, are in need of more information, or need to be thoroughly sourced and copy-edited to make it a good article candidate. The aim of this project is to improve the quality of Wikipedia's professional wrestling-related articles through widespread cooperative editing. It is our hope that some of these will go on to become featured articles. At any given time there will be six active collaborations; one will be chosen from each of the following five categories: wrestling legend, current wrestler, tag team, stub article, list, and pay-per-view. Rather than setting a specific length of time for collaborations, each collaboration will last until the article has reached a certain level of quality. Most collaborations will be active until the editors involved believe it is ready to be nominated for good article status. The list collaboration will proceed until it is ready to be nominated for featured list status. The stub article collaboration will continue as long as possible, although there may not be sufficient information available for good article status. For general discussion of the tasks of WikiProject Professional wrestling, please see the project's talk page. |
|
Contents |
[edit] Templates
When a page is selected to be the "professional wrestling collaboration of the week", it's talk page will be tagged with {{Current-PWCOTW}}:
| This is the current professional wrestling collaboration of the week! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling article. |
Former collaborations are tagged on their talk page with {{Current-PWCOTW|Former|Start date|End date}}. For example:
| This article was the professional wrestling collaboration of the week between April 23 and April 29 2007 Please help to continue to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling article. |
[edit] Selecting the next PWCOTW
[edit] How it works
- Articles are kept as COTW until they reach a certain goal.
- For "Wrestling legends" the goal is GA status.
- For "Current wrestler" the goal is GA status.
- For "Tag team" the goal is GA status.
- For "Stub article" the goal is Start-Class or higher (any articles expanded fivefold will also be nominated for a Did you know appearance on Wikipedia's main page).
- For "Pay-per-view" the goal is GA status.
- For "Lists" the goal is WP:FL status.
- If the nominated article is already a Good article, then the goal becomes FA status.
[edit] How to nominate
- Guidelines
- A removed article can only be renominated after a second round of articles are chosen.
- You must be a registered user to nominate an article.
- If you have already nominated an article in the same section, all your existing nominations require at least three votes each for you to nominate a new article.
- Please only nominate or "vote" on articles that you plan to work on when they become COTW.
- Considerations for nominations
- Giving reasons why an article should become the PWCOTW may convince others to support your nomination.
- Can the wider professional wrestling community easily contribute to the article? Or is it something only a small number of people will know about?
- Is the article a stub or very short?
- A good place to look for articles that might be worthy of a nomination are the professional wrestling stubs and bio stubs.
- Articles that are already classed as good articles can be nominated; the goal for these articles will be to elevate them to featured article status. For a list of current good articles, see professional wrestling GA-Class articles.
- Consider renominating a past candidate for COTW which had strong support but didn't quite make the cut.
- Also consider nominating an article from our project's cleanup listing that has several cleanup banners.
- Add nomination
Copy and paste the following template and fill it out.
====[[Article]]==== ; Support: # ~~~~ ; Comments: * (put your reason for nomination) ~~~~
[edit] Voting
A vote or a show of support for an article shows your commitment to support and aid in collaborating on that specific article if it is chosen. Although you are not required to fulfill that commitment, we ask that you only support articles that you are able to contribute to so that this collaboration's goals of expanding and improving articles can adequately be achieved. Feel free to vote for as many candidates as you like.
Any registered user is encouraged to vote so long as you abide by the policies of Wikipedia, specifically Wikipedia:Sock puppetry.
Please add only support votes. Opposing votes will not affect the result, as the winner is simply the one with the most support votes (see Approval voting).
To vote for a nomination, edit the nomination and add the following to the bottom of the Support section:
# ~~~~
This adds your username and a time stamp to the numbered list item. The vote will look like this:
- Username 08:59, 1 July 2005 (UTC)
If you wish to withdraw your vote, do not remove your vote; instead, add an asterisk and strike-through tags to your vote as shown:
#* <s>[[User:Username|Username]] 08:59, 1 July 2005 (UTC)</s>
This allows Wikipedia to correctly calculate the remaining votes and will appear like this:
- Username2 08:39, 1 July 2005 (UTC)
Username 08:59, 1 July 2005 (UTC)
- Username3 08:39, 2 July 2005 (UTC)
Note: We do not choose the article through consensus; we choose it through a majority voting system.
[edit] Ties
In the case of a tie, voting will be extended for 24 hours. If there is still a tie, the candidate that was nominated first wins.
[edit] Pruning
As voting comes to a close, any nominations that do not win will be removed. Removed nominations can only be renominated after a second round of articles are chosen.
[edit] Current nominations
- Please do not vote for articles you have no intention of working on.
[edit] Wrestling legend
[edit] Jim Londos
- Support
- Endlessdan and his problem 19:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- The old timer articles have been neglected for too long. Info for wrestlers of the last thirty years are plentiful on the internet. And I'd sooner refer to OWW or a MySpace page for info on an active wrestler then a Wiki-article. --Endlessdan and his problem 18:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rodney Anoa'i
- Support
- Comments
- Although reliable sources are provided, a cleanup I think's necessary here, and some extra detail could get added. D.M.N. (talk) 19:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, Yokozuna deserves better. This article should be at least a B-Class.--WillC 19:54, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Are you planning to help me work on it should this become the promoted one in the "Wrestling Legends" section. If not, then this vote should get struck. Again, I find this pointless unless people are actually willing to work with others on chosen articles if they chose to vote for it. D.M.N. (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Steve Lombardi
- Support
- Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not really a legend but... Jobber and wrestling trainer and road agent. Should be easy to expand and find sources for. And it won't be bloated by week-by-week. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] William Afflis
- Support
- Endlessdan and his problem 15:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- The Bruiser's article is in terrible shape. --Endlessdan and his problem 15:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Current wrestler
[edit] Vince McMahon
- Support
- Nikki311 04:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 22:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Gavyn Sykes (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Not really a "wrestler", but an active personality. Needs major work. Bloated with week by week. Could use some better sources. Importance = high. Nikki311 04:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Gregory Helms
- Support
- Comments
- With him coming back, this should be in good condition, looks fairly close to passing GA --Numyht (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Beth Phoenix
- Support
- Comments
- This shouldn't be too difficult to get to GA status. I have an interview saved on my computer that I've been meaning to use to source the article...this should give me an excuse to do it. :) :) Nikki♥311 20:47, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tag team or stable
[edit] The Quebecers
- Support
- GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- D.M.N. (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Nikki311 17:17, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- One of my favorite teams. Three-time WWF Tag Team Champions. The article needs some cleanup and sourcing. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Having cleaned up Carl Ouellet a few weeks ago with a few sources (diff) this would be a good one to do. Slam! Sports has a few stories on the two, see the links at the bottom here. D.M.N. (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Allied Powers (wrestling)
- Support
- GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- I just came across a few great print sources (a couple of detailed profiles and an interview with Luger about why he ended the partnership). I'd love to work on expanding the article and would appreciate some help with copyediting and replacing the CompleteWWE sources. GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Edge and Christian
- Support
- Comments
- If Christian is actually returning to WWE this article should be at least B class because they may reunite the team and ips are going to be all over this article if that happens.--WillC 07:07, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Stub article
[edit] Backyard Wrestling 2: There Goes the Neighborhood
- Support
- Altenhofen (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- It's important, plain and simple! Altenhofen (talk) 22:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] PG-13 (professional wrestling)
- Support
- GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Nikki♥311 20:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Shouldn't be too hard to find enough to get this up to start class. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Pay-per-view
[edit] War to Settle the Score
- Support
- GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Doesn't exist yet, but I've always thought that this event (and, down the road, the Brawl to End it All) should have an article. GaryColemanFan (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WWF Capital Carnage
- Support
- CMPunkster (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Reads very much like a play by play review, it would be good to add a background to the event and it requires a fair bit of cleaning up. CMPunkster (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] List
[edit] List of Total Nonstop Action Wrestling alumni
- Support
- WillC 01:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- iMatthew (talk) 02:01, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Nikki♥311 20:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- It doesn't have many sources. It has a reference tag on it. A lot of questionable admissions. IPs edit the thing everyday. No telling how many times I've had to undo ips removing Rey Mysterio's name when I'm not even sure if he was in TNA. Should be improved.WillC 01:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- More citation tags than I've ever seen. We should be able to at least cut the number in half. Nikki♥311 20:49, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

